<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining the inadmissible Cenvat credit wrongly availed was not sustainable due to procedural issues. The service tax on commission received for selling SIM cards/recharge vouchers was deemed not leviable under Business Auxiliary Service, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to the prescribed limit, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1855 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining the inadmissible Cenvat credit wrongly availed was not sustainable due to procedural issues. The service tax on commission received for selling SIM cards/recharge vouchers was deemed not leviable under Business Auxiliary Service, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to the prescribed limit, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>