<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1854 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266579</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the demand of duty, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs. The Tribunal determined that the services provided, including painting of various properties, did not fall under taxable categories. It disagreed with the Commissioner on interpretation of legal provisions and circulars, citing case law precedents. The Tribunal also found the change in classification without notice to be against natural justice principles. Consequently, the demand for service tax and related penalties was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1854 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266579</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the demand of duty, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs. The Tribunal determined that the services provided, including painting of various properties, did not fall under taxable categories. It disagreed with the Commissioner on interpretation of legal provisions and circulars, citing case law precedents. The Tribunal also found the change in classification without notice to be against natural justice principles. Consequently, the demand for service tax and related penalties was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>