<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 15 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=831</link>
    <description>A divisible turn-key contract with separately identified design and engineering charges could be taxed on the segregated consulting engineer service portion, because the contract and invoices clearly quantified that taxable element apart from supplies and execution work. The presence of non-taxable obligations in the same transaction did not make the entire contract indivisible where the taxable service was separately identifiable and enforceable in part. On that basis, the design and engineering component was held exigible to service tax and the demand was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 15 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=831</link>
      <description>A divisible turn-key contract with separately identified design and engineering charges could be taxed on the segregated consulting engineer service portion, because the contract and invoices clearly quantified that taxable element apart from supplies and execution work. The presence of non-taxable obligations in the same transaction did not make the entire contract indivisible where the taxable service was separately identifiable and enforceable in part. On that basis, the design and engineering component was held exigible to service tax and the demand was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>