https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174810 Criminal prosecution under the foreign exchange law was treated as legally distinct from adjudication proceedings, so a show cause notice, pending adjudication, or even the adjudication outcome did not bar institution or continuation of the prosecution. The Court also held that the Special Judge had valid jurisdiction to take cognizance because the repeal and saving provisions, read with the governing notification, preserved and authorised that power. The challenge to cognizance on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and procedural irregularity was rejected, and the quashing application failed. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174810 Criminal prosecution under the foreign exchange law was treated as legally distinct from adjudication proceedings, so a show cause notice, pending adjudication, or even the adjudication outcome did not bar institution or continuation of the prosecution. The Court also held that the Special Judge had valid jurisdiction to take cognizance because the repeal and saving provisions, read with the governing notification, preserved and authorised that power. The challenge to cognizance on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and procedural irregularity was rejected, and the quashing application failed. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174810