https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174806 A sitting of the Lok Sabha resumed after adjournment sine die was held to be a continuation of the same session, not the commencement of the first session of the year, so no Presidential address under Article 87 was required. The Court also held that challenges to the Speaker's direction and the House proceedings concerned internal parliamentary procedure and were barred from judicial review by Article 122. In the absence of an pleaded violation of a fundamental right, Article 32 was not available, and the challenge was treated as not maintainable; the later dissolution of the Lok Sabha also rendered the matter infructuous. en-us Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174806 A sitting of the Lok Sabha resumed after adjournment sine die was held to be a continuation of the same session, not the commencement of the first session of the year, so no Presidential address under Article 87 was required. The Court also held that challenges to the Speaker's direction and the House proceedings concerned internal parliamentary procedure and were barred from judicial review by Article 122. In the absence of an pleaded violation of a fundamental right, Article 32 was not available, and the challenge was treated as not maintainable; the later dissolution of the Lok Sabha also rendered the matter infructuous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174806