<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1834 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the Cenvat credit in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that it would rectify the excess adjustment and not result in unjust enrichment. The appellant was entitled to the specific Cenvat credit amount sought for refund, as it exceeded the required duty payment adjustment. The judgment highlighted the unique circumstances where the credit was not necessary for duty payment, leading to the appellant&#039;s entitlement for credit restoration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1834 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of the Cenvat credit in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that it would rectify the excess adjustment and not result in unjust enrichment. The appellant was entitled to the specific Cenvat credit amount sought for refund, as it exceeded the required duty payment adjustment. The judgment highlighted the unique circumstances where the credit was not necessary for duty payment, leading to the appellant&#039;s entitlement for credit restoration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>