<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1815 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266540</link>
    <description>The judge set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation in light of the Larger Bench decision and addressing the issue of limitation on the demand. The appellant&#039;s submissions were to be duly considered, and a proper opportunity for a hearing was to be provided before any new order was passed. The appeal was allowed via remand for a comprehensive reconsideration of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1815 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266540</link>
      <description>The judge set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation in light of the Larger Bench decision and addressing the issue of limitation on the demand. The appellant&#039;s submissions were to be duly considered, and a proper opportunity for a hearing was to be provided before any new order was passed. The appeal was allowed via remand for a comprehensive reconsideration of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>