https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266529 The court found no merit in the appeals regarding the clandestine removal of transformers and overlapping periods in show-cause notices. However, the appellant's claim for cum-tax treatment was deemed justified. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reevaluation of the duty quantum and penalty considering the cum-tax benefit. The court's decision was pronounced on 12.12.2014. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266529 The court found no merit in the appeals regarding the clandestine removal of transformers and overlapping periods in show-cause notices. However, the appellant's claim for cum-tax treatment was deemed justified. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for reevaluation of the duty quantum and penalty considering the cum-tax benefit. The court's decision was pronounced on 12.12.2014. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266529