<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1803 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred by the ld. Commissioner (A). The Tribunal found that the order of cancellation of the registration certificate was not properly communicated to the appellant as required by Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As a result, the Tribunal held that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit, overturning the decision of the ld. Commissioner (A) and remanding the case for further consideration on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1803 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred by the ld. Commissioner (A). The Tribunal found that the order of cancellation of the registration certificate was not properly communicated to the appellant as required by Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As a result, the Tribunal held that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit, overturning the decision of the ld. Commissioner (A) and remanding the case for further consideration on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>