https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266515 The appellant successfully demonstrated compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. by adhering to Rule 6(3)(i) and reversing the required amount under Rule 6(3D), establishing non-availment of Cenvat credit. The judgment emphasized the significance of correctly interpreting and applying the rules and notifications to ascertain fulfillment of exemption conditions. Consequently, the stay petition was unconditionally allowed based on this finding. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:36:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266515 The appellant successfully demonstrated compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. by adhering to Rule 6(3)(i) and reversing the required amount under Rule 6(3D), establishing non-availment of Cenvat credit. The judgment emphasized the significance of correctly interpreting and applying the rules and notifications to ascertain fulfillment of exemption conditions. Consequently, the stay petition was unconditionally allowed based on this finding. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266515