https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266511 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the Revenue's appeal against non-compliance with Section 35(B)(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the necessity of a formal order with joint signatures from the Committee of Commissioners to direct a Central Excise Officer to file an appeal. The Tribunal ruled that mere notings on a notesheet did not meet the statutory requirement, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to procedural rules. This case underscores the significance of following legal procedures accurately, as deviations may lead to adverse outcomes such as appeal dismissals. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:22:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266511 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the Revenue's appeal against non-compliance with Section 35(B)(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the necessity of a formal order with joint signatures from the Committee of Commissioners to direct a Central Excise Officer to file an appeal. The Tribunal ruled that mere notings on a notesheet did not meet the statutory requirement, highlighting the importance of strict adherence to procedural rules. This case underscores the significance of following legal procedures accurately, as deviations may lead to adverse outcomes such as appeal dismissals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266511