<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1784 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the Appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 25(1)(a) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 based on Notification No.67/95-CE. The decision highlighted the significance of legal interpretations and specific statutory wording in excise matters, concluding that the Appellant had established a prima facie case for the waiver of all dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1784 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the Appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 25(1)(a) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 based on Notification No.67/95-CE. The decision highlighted the significance of legal interpretations and specific statutory wording in excise matters, concluding that the Appellant had established a prima facie case for the waiver of all dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>