<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1774 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266499</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was not liable to pay the differential duty as the notification was not in force when duty was paid and clearance obtained. The Court ordered the release of the bank guarantee/bond furnished by the petitioner, subject to obtaining necessary clearances before the effective date of the new notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1774 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266499</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was not liable to pay the differential duty as the notification was not in force when duty was paid and clearance obtained. The Court ordered the release of the bank guarantee/bond furnished by the petitioner, subject to obtaining necessary clearances before the effective date of the new notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>