<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1771 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266496</link>
    <description>The judgment held that unpaid wages/salary of a workman/employee are considered debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The employee has the right to file a Company Petition for winding up against the respondent-Company as a creditor. The Court overturned the opinion that unpaid salary is not a debt and clarified that employees with unpaid wages are creditors entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Company Court. The matter was remitted to the Company Judge for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1771 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266496</link>
      <description>The judgment held that unpaid wages/salary of a workman/employee are considered debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The employee has the right to file a Company Petition for winding up against the respondent-Company as a creditor. The Court overturned the opinion that unpaid salary is not a debt and clarified that employees with unpaid wages are creditors entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Company Court. The matter was remitted to the Company Judge for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>