<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1758 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not valid as the CIT failed to establish that the assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The assessment order passed by the AO under Section 143(3) was deemed reasonable. The Tribunal quashed the notice and order issued by the CIT under Section 263, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1758 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was not valid as the CIT failed to establish that the assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The assessment order passed by the AO under Section 143(3) was deemed reasonable. The Tribunal quashed the notice and order issued by the CIT under Section 263, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>