<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1746 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266471</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) exceeded jurisdiction by introducing a new source of income, improperly applied Section 50C, and the reopening of assessment was invalid. The tax liability on the sale of the property was determined to rest with the estates of Mrs. Meerabai Dawson as per the compromise agreement, avoiding double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1746 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266471</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) exceeded jurisdiction by introducing a new source of income, improperly applied Section 50C, and the reopening of assessment was invalid. The tax liability on the sale of the property was determined to rest with the estates of Mrs. Meerabai Dawson as per the compromise agreement, avoiding double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>