<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174802</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the transfer order mala fide and based on irrelevant grounds, quashing it. The appellant was directed to be treated as on leave for the disputed period, with the respondents instructed to pass an appropriate order invoking the leave rules. The Court highlighted the need for balance and fairness in such cases, partially allowing the appeal and ordering the respondents to bear the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174802</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the transfer order mala fide and based on irrelevant grounds, quashing it. The appellant was directed to be treated as on leave for the disputed period, with the respondents instructed to pass an appropriate order invoking the leave rules. The Court highlighted the need for balance and fairness in such cases, partially allowing the appeal and ordering the respondents to bear the appellant&#039;s counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>