https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174801 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's judgment that quashed a Garden Curator's transfer order from Shillong to Pauri, Uttar Pradesh. The Court held that transfer orders should align with statutory provisions and cannot be interfered with unless malafide or violating the law, emphasizing that administrative guidelines are not legally enforceable rights for government employees. The Court clarified the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in service matters, stating it cannot act as an appellate authority over transfer orders and must not substitute its judgment for the competent authority's decision. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:27:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174801 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's judgment that quashed a Garden Curator's transfer order from Shillong to Pauri, Uttar Pradesh. The Court held that transfer orders should align with statutory provisions and cannot be interfered with unless malafide or violating the law, emphasizing that administrative guidelines are not legally enforceable rights for government employees. The Court clarified the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in service matters, stating it cannot act as an appellate authority over transfer orders and must not substitute its judgment for the competent authority's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174801