<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 33 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s Review Order, ruling that the technology transfer fee paid for services rendered in Malaysia was not subject to service tax in India. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, relying on cited judgments to support their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 33 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s Review Order, ruling that the technology transfer fee paid for services rendered in Malaysia was not subject to service tax in India. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, relying on cited judgments to support their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>