<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174783</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 55,50,000 on account of alleged unexplained share application money u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for the A.Y. 2004-05 was dismissed. The ld. CIT(A) found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, supported by documents proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. Legal precedents were cited to emphasize that without evidence challenging the authenticity of the documents provided, no addition could be made to the appellant&#039;s income. Thus, the deletion of the addition was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 532 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174783</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 55,50,000 on account of alleged unexplained share application money u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for the A.Y. 2004-05 was dismissed. The ld. CIT(A) found the appellant&#039;s explanation satisfactory, supported by documents proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. Legal precedents were cited to emphasize that without evidence challenging the authenticity of the documents provided, no addition could be made to the appellant&#039;s income. Thus, the deletion of the addition was upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>