<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1739 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties related to alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit on advertisement services. The penalties imposed under Section 77(1)(c) of the Finance Act, 1994 were also set aside due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in providing necessary information. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and reasonable cause in penalty imposition under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1739 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties related to alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit on advertisement services. The penalties imposed under Section 77(1)(c) of the Finance Act, 1994 were also set aside due to the appellant&#039;s reasonable belief in providing necessary information. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and reasonable cause in penalty imposition under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>