<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1734 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over service tax liability for recruitment services rendered abroad, holding that the services provided constituted export of services. The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, confirming a minor service tax liability with interest but ruling against penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1734 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over service tax liability for recruitment services rendered abroad, holding that the services provided constituted export of services. The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, confirming a minor service tax liability with interest but ruling against penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was deemed unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>