<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1729 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266454</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered company under Tamil Nadu CST and Central Sale Tax Act, in a case concerning the interference with the sale and transport of empty beer bottles collected in Tamil Nadu. The court found that the respondent&#039;s actions violated the petitioner&#039;s rights under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 301 of the Constitution of India. Emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting allegations of misuse and citing a previous ruling on a similar matter, the court allowed the writ petition, restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioner&#039;s business activities related to the empty beer bottles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1729 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266454</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered company under Tamil Nadu CST and Central Sale Tax Act, in a case concerning the interference with the sale and transport of empty beer bottles collected in Tamil Nadu. The court found that the respondent&#039;s actions violated the petitioner&#039;s rights under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 301 of the Constitution of India. Emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting allegations of misuse and citing a previous ruling on a similar matter, the court allowed the writ petition, restraining the respondent from interfering with the petitioner&#039;s business activities related to the empty beer bottles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>