<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision without sending it back to the primary adjudicating authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to determine the admissible refund amount based on a thorough review of all relevant records and grant the refund accordingly, with the respondent given an opportunity to present their case. A timeline of three months was set for the completion of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:50:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision without sending it back to the primary adjudicating authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to determine the admissible refund amount based on a thorough review of all relevant records and grant the refund accordingly, with the respondent given an opportunity to present their case. A timeline of three months was set for the completion of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>