https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266423 The appellant successfully changed the cause title and contested the demand for excise duty on goods cleared under specific rules. The duty demand and penalty were confirmed due to procedural violations, although the limitation period for issuing the notice had lapsed. The appellant's argument regarding the goods not requiring reprocessing and the limitation issue led to the demand under one rule being set aside. Ultimately, the appellant was held liable for a penalty under a different rule for procedural violations, with an imposed penalty of 10,000. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266423 The appellant successfully changed the cause title and contested the demand for excise duty on goods cleared under specific rules. The duty demand and penalty were confirmed due to procedural violations, although the limitation period for issuing the notice had lapsed. The appellant's argument regarding the goods not requiring reprocessing and the limitation issue led to the demand under one rule being set aside. Ultimately, the appellant was held liable for a penalty under a different rule for procedural violations, with an imposed penalty of 10,000. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266423