https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266422 The appeal against the denial of remission of duty was successful. The Tribunal found that the tank was not filled to capacity, duly tested, and the accident was not due to negligence. The appellant was held entitled to the claim, and the impugned order denying remission of duty was set aside. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:40:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266422 The appeal against the denial of remission of duty was successful. The Tribunal found that the tank was not filled to capacity, duly tested, and the accident was not due to negligence. The appellant was held entitled to the claim, and the impugned order denying remission of duty was set aside. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266422