https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266414 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal based on the time bar issue regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on specific items used in fabrication. The Tribunal found that there was no intention to evade duty payment, and the extended period for demanding duty was deemed inapplicable in this case. The decision highlighted confusion among manufacturers regarding CENVAT Credit admissibility, referencing relevant case law to support the Appellant's position. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266414 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal based on the time bar issue regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on specific items used in fabrication. The Tribunal found that there was no intention to evade duty payment, and the extended period for demanding duty was deemed inapplicable in this case. The decision highlighted confusion among manufacturers regarding CENVAT Credit admissibility, referencing relevant case law to support the Appellant's position. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266414