https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266407 The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's non-compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, concerning disputed duty demands, disallowed CENVAT credit, and trading activities. The appellant's appeal was questioned due to failure to deposit 7.5% of the duty demanded. The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply by depositing the required amount within a specified timeframe, highlighting the significance of adherence to statutory provisions for appeal maintainability in excise cases. en-us Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:39:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266407 The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's non-compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, concerning disputed duty demands, disallowed CENVAT credit, and trading activities. The appellant's appeal was questioned due to failure to deposit 7.5% of the duty demanded. The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply by depositing the required amount within a specified timeframe, highlighting the significance of adherence to statutory provisions for appeal maintainability in excise cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266407