https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266406 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that delivery charges and road freight subsidy charges should not be included in the assessable value of petroleum products cleared from a warehouse. The Tribunal emphasized that during the relevant period, charges collected from customers were not part of the assessable value. By considering previous decisions and legal interpretations, the Tribunal set aside the demand for excise duty and penalty imposed on the appellant, concluding that the charges in question were not sustainable based on legal precedents. en-us Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266406 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that delivery charges and road freight subsidy charges should not be included in the assessable value of petroleum products cleared from a warehouse. The Tribunal emphasized that during the relevant period, charges collected from customers were not part of the assessable value. By considering previous decisions and legal interpretations, the Tribunal set aside the demand for excise duty and penalty imposed on the appellant, concluding that the charges in question were not sustainable based on legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266406