<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266397</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, absolving them of the penalty for clearing goods without duty payment from July 2003 to March 2004. The decision emphasized the appellant&#039;s genuine belief in the eligibility for duty exemption post the proprietor&#039;s demise, acknowledging the absence of malafide intent. The penalty imposition was set aside, granting the benefit of the doubt to the appellant, while confirming the duty and interest amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266397</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, absolving them of the penalty for clearing goods without duty payment from July 2003 to March 2004. The decision emphasized the appellant&#039;s genuine belief in the eligibility for duty exemption post the proprietor&#039;s demise, acknowledging the absence of malafide intent. The penalty imposition was set aside, granting the benefit of the doubt to the appellant, while confirming the duty and interest amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>