<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1666 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest was payable on the reversed Cenvat credit amount from the date of clearance till the date of payment, citing Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as the necessary elements for imposing it were deemed absent. The appellant was directed to pay the interest but was relieved of the penalty obligation, resulting in the disposal of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1666 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest was payable on the reversed Cenvat credit amount from the date of clearance till the date of payment, citing Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside as the necessary elements for imposing it were deemed absent. The appellant was directed to pay the interest but was relieved of the penalty obligation, resulting in the disposal of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>