<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1665 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Gujarat High Court and the Supreme Court, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruling in favor of the Respondent on both issues. The Tribunal held that the reduced penalty under Section 11AC was justified based on precedents and that imposing a separate penalty on the partner of a partnership firm was not permissible as the partner is not a distinct legal entity from the firm already penalized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1665 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Gujarat High Court and the Supreme Court, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruling in favor of the Respondent on both issues. The Tribunal held that the reduced penalty under Section 11AC was justified based on precedents and that imposing a separate penalty on the partner of a partnership firm was not permissible as the partner is not a distinct legal entity from the firm already penalized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>