<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1663 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266388</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad, in a judgment by Mr. P.K. Das, ruled that interest is not payable on wrongly availed and subsequently reversed Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing various precedents and emphasizing the difference between availing credit and its actual utilization. The decision underscored that mere reversal of credit does not always necessitate interest payment, aligning with previous judicial interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1663 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266388</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad, in a judgment by Mr. P.K. Das, ruled that interest is not payable on wrongly availed and subsequently reversed Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing various precedents and emphasizing the difference between availing credit and its actual utilization. The decision underscored that mere reversal of credit does not always necessitate interest payment, aligning with previous judicial interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>