<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 45 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=805</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the assessment of sales value for excise duty, inclusion of royalty in assessable value, related party transactions, time-barred demand, and imposition of interest and penalty under Sections 11AB &amp;amp; 11AC. The tribunal found that there was sufficient evidence to show that price was not the sole consideration of sale, leading to the rejection of the appellants&#039; contentions. Ultimately, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty and setting aside the confiscation of assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 45 - Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=805</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding the assessment of sales value for excise duty, inclusion of royalty in assessable value, related party transactions, time-barred demand, and imposition of interest and penalty under Sections 11AB &amp;amp; 11AC. The tribunal found that there was sufficient evidence to show that price was not the sole consideration of sale, leading to the rejection of the appellants&#039; contentions. Ultimately, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty and setting aside the confiscation of assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>