https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266385 The Tribunal granted the appellant a waiver on the pre-deposit of duty demand, interest, and penalty for the appeal hearing, with recovery stayed, due to conflicting judgments on the constitutionality of Rule 8(3A) and duty payment requirements during a delay in discharging monthly duty liability. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable based on the Gujarat High Court's declaration of Rule 8(3A) as unconstitutional in a similar case, emphasizing the need to utilize cenvat credit during the forfeiture period. The stay application was allowed, pending the appeal hearing. en-us Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266385 The Tribunal granted the appellant a waiver on the pre-deposit of duty demand, interest, and penalty for the appeal hearing, with recovery stayed, due to conflicting judgments on the constitutionality of Rule 8(3A) and duty payment requirements during a delay in discharging monthly duty liability. The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable based on the Gujarat High Court's declaration of Rule 8(3A) as unconstitutional in a similar case, emphasizing the need to utilize cenvat credit during the forfeiture period. The stay application was allowed, pending the appeal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266385