<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266381</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order that confiscated goods, imposed redemption fines, and penalties on the main appellant and co-appellant. It was held that the main appellant had fulfilled obligations by paying duty, interest, and penalty within the specified time, concluding the proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that if payments were made promptly, show cause notices should be concluded. Relying on precedent, it was determined that confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties were unwarranted. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1656 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266381</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order that confiscated goods, imposed redemption fines, and penalties on the main appellant and co-appellant. It was held that the main appellant had fulfilled obligations by paying duty, interest, and penalty within the specified time, concluding the proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that if payments were made promptly, show cause notices should be concluded. Relying on precedent, it was determined that confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties were unwarranted. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>