<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 33 - Appellate Tribunal, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=804</link>
    <description>Where an assessee clears both dutiable and exempted non-ferrous metal powders without maintaining separate accounts for inputs, liability arises under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, corresponding to Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The exemption applied only to clearances to State-funded research institutions under Notification No. 10/97-CE, while other clearances remained dutiable. Payment already made on exempted clearances and recovery from buyers did not defeat the demand, and the differential amount based on the invoice value remained recoverable. The demand was therefore sustained and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 33 - Appellate Tribunal, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=804</link>
      <description>Where an assessee clears both dutiable and exempted non-ferrous metal powders without maintaining separate accounts for inputs, liability arises under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, corresponding to Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The exemption applied only to clearances to State-funded research institutions under Notification No. 10/97-CE, while other clearances remained dutiable. Payment already made on exempted clearances and recovery from buyers did not defeat the demand, and the differential amount based on the invoice value remained recoverable. The demand was therefore sustained and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>