https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266369 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's recredit of the CENVAT amount was valid without the need for a refund application under Section 11B. It was determined that the recredit was a correction of entries and did not require departmental intervention, following a precedent from the High Court of Madras. The tribunal found the denial of recredit by the department unjustified, setting aside the order and emphasizing that the recredit was a procedural correction rather than a legal dispute. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:37:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266369 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's recredit of the CENVAT amount was valid without the need for a refund application under Section 11B. It was determined that the recredit was a correction of entries and did not require departmental intervention, following a precedent from the High Court of Madras. The tribunal found the denial of recredit by the department unjustified, setting aside the order and emphasizing that the recredit was a procedural correction rather than a legal dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266369