<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1641 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266366</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals in a case involving duty demand, interest, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods based on discrepancies in the transporter&#039;s ledger. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand unsustainable due to lack of corroborative evidence beyond the transporter&#039;s ledger. As a result, the penalties imposed on both appellants were deemed not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1641 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266366</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals in a case involving duty demand, interest, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods based on discrepancies in the transporter&#039;s ledger. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand unsustainable due to lack of corroborative evidence beyond the transporter&#039;s ledger. As a result, the penalties imposed on both appellants were deemed not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>