<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1640 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant on various issues. It emphasized the appellant&#039;s good prima facie case, the disputable nature of the classification issue, and consistent filings under Chapter 50. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision without predeposit, and directed a decision on merits without financial constraints on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1640 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant on various issues. It emphasized the appellant&#039;s good prima facie case, the disputable nature of the classification issue, and consistent filings under Chapter 50. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision without predeposit, and directed a decision on merits without financial constraints on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>