https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266360 The court ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of credit on imported goods due to procedural irregularities. Despite acknowledging the procedural issues raised by the Additional Commissioner, the judge found evidence supporting that the goods were received by the appellant, utilized in manufacturing, and the final products were cleared after duty payment. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, determining that there was no justification to deny the cenvat credit to the appellant. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266360 The court ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of credit on imported goods due to procedural irregularities. Despite acknowledging the procedural issues raised by the Additional Commissioner, the judge found evidence supporting that the goods were received by the appellant, utilized in manufacturing, and the final products were cleared after duty payment. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, determining that there was no justification to deny the cenvat credit to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266360