https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266359 The appeal was successful as the presiding member agreed with the appellants' argument that the demand invoking a longer period alleging suppression of facts was not sustainable and time-barred. Consequently, the necessity for a pre-deposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted for the duration of the appeal, ensuring the appellants were not unduly burdened during the legal process. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266359 The appeal was successful as the presiding member agreed with the appellants' argument that the demand invoking a longer period alleging suppression of facts was not sustainable and time-barred. Consequently, the necessity for a pre-deposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted for the duration of the appeal, ensuring the appellants were not unduly burdened during the legal process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266359