<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1624 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266349</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of brokerage/commission expenses and unexplained cash credit addition under section 68. The CIT(A) and ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s explanations, emphasizing the substantial increase in turnover and supporting evidence provided for both issues. The lack of evidence by the Revenue to challenge the genuineness of payments and loans from HUFs led to the deletion of both additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1624 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266349</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of brokerage/commission expenses and unexplained cash credit addition under section 68. The CIT(A) and ITAT upheld the assessee&#039;s explanations, emphasizing the substantial increase in turnover and supporting evidence provided for both issues. The lack of evidence by the Revenue to challenge the genuineness of payments and loans from HUFs led to the deletion of both additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>