<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1618 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that only profits and turnover of the Export Oriented Unit should be considered was upheld, emphasizing the importance of separate audited accounts for different units in computing deductions. The Tribunal highlighted the confusion in interpreting Section 10B and emphasized adherence to statutory provisions for accurate deduction calculation methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1618 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that only profits and turnover of the Export Oriented Unit should be considered was upheld, emphasizing the importance of separate audited accounts for different units in computing deductions. The Tribunal highlighted the confusion in interpreting Section 10B and emphasized adherence to statutory provisions for accurate deduction calculation methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>