<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1617 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266342</link>
    <description>The ITAT reversed the CIT(A) order in favor of the Revenue in an appeal concerning TDS on contract payment for A.Y 2012-13 and 2013-14. The case involved the interpretation of contractual terms between the Assessee and M/s. Arihant Ship Breakers Pvt. Ltd., where the ITAT determined that the retained amount of Rs. 10 crores was part of the total consideration and subject to TDS under Sec. 194C. The ITAT emphasized the importance of contractual terms in determining TDS obligations, ultimately upholding the Revenue&#039;s appeals and overturning the CIT(A) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1617 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266342</link>
      <description>The ITAT reversed the CIT(A) order in favor of the Revenue in an appeal concerning TDS on contract payment for A.Y 2012-13 and 2013-14. The case involved the interpretation of contractual terms between the Assessee and M/s. Arihant Ship Breakers Pvt. Ltd., where the ITAT determined that the retained amount of Rs. 10 crores was part of the total consideration and subject to TDS under Sec. 194C. The ITAT emphasized the importance of contractual terms in determining TDS obligations, ultimately upholding the Revenue&#039;s appeals and overturning the CIT(A) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>