<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a case involving the treatment of income from share trading. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed when there is a genuine dispute on income classification. The decision aligned with the previous year&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of considering specific facts before levying penalties under tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in a case involving the treatment of income from share trading. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed when there is a genuine dispute on income classification. The decision aligned with the previous year&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the importance of considering specific facts before levying penalties under tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>