<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from higher figures reflected in the balance sheet, and a demand resting only on that material is unsustainable. Escalation charges, however, form part of the assessable value and are includible for excise purposes. Claims concerning cum-duty price, valuation, time-bar and penalty required fresh factual and legal examination, so those matters were remanded for de novo consideration by the Commissioner. The result was that the clandestine-removal demand was set aside, inclusion of escalation charges was upheld, and the remaining issues were sent back for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 36 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from higher figures reflected in the balance sheet, and a demand resting only on that material is unsustainable. Escalation charges, however, form part of the assessable value and are includible for excise purposes. Claims concerning cum-duty price, valuation, time-bar and penalty required fresh factual and legal examination, so those matters were remanded for de novo consideration by the Commissioner. The result was that the clandestine-removal demand was set aside, inclusion of escalation charges was upheld, and the remaining issues were sent back for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>