<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed interest expenditure of Rs. 38,98,474. The Tribunal held that the liability for the interest expenditure crystallized in the current assessment year, supported by debit notes issued within the relevant period, despite the interest being charged for purchases from the previous year. Relying on precedent and consistent accounting practices, the Tribunal concluded that the expenditure should be deductible in the year it crystallized, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the expenditure as a prior period expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1595 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed interest expenditure of Rs. 38,98,474. The Tribunal held that the liability for the interest expenditure crystallized in the current assessment year, supported by debit notes issued within the relevant period, despite the interest being charged for purchases from the previous year. Relying on precedent and consistent accounting practices, the Tribunal concluded that the expenditure should be deductible in the year it crystallized, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the expenditure as a prior period expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>