https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798 The Tribunal denied the appellant the benefit of SSI Exemption due to the unauthorized use of registered brand names. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods were dismissed for lack of evidence. The valuation based on Section 4A was set aside as the revision of value solely on sticker prices was deemed inappropriate. Confiscation of goods for non-entry in the RG1 Register was upheld, leading to fines and penalties. The impugned order was modified, and the matter was remanded for duty re-computation and penalty assessment. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798 The Tribunal denied the appellant the benefit of SSI Exemption due to the unauthorized use of registered brand names. Allegations of clandestine removal of goods were dismissed for lack of evidence. The valuation based on Section 4A was set aside as the revision of value solely on sticker prices was deemed inappropriate. Confiscation of goods for non-entry in the RG1 Register was upheld, leading to fines and penalties. The impugned order was modified, and the matter was remanded for duty re-computation and penalty assessment. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798