<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1584 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266309</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case back to the AO for fresh consideration regarding the deduction u/s. 80-IC. The ITAT emphasized the importance of verifying factual errors, directing the AO to re-examine the issues and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the case was restored to the AO for a new decision in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1584 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266309</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the case back to the AO for fresh consideration regarding the deduction u/s. 80-IC. The ITAT emphasized the importance of verifying factual errors, directing the AO to re-examine the issues and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, and the case was restored to the AO for a new decision in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>